Lepilemur edwardsiMilne-Edwards's sportive lemur

Ge­o­graphic Range

Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi is lim­ited to the west­ern trop­i­cal dry de­cid­u­ous forests of Mada­gas­car and has a range of less than 20,000 square kilo­me­ters (Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006; Andrainar­ivo et al., 2008). It is more specif­i­cally found from “north of the Bet­si­boka River to the Bay of Loza and the Mae­varano River, and in­clud­ing the Bon­golava Mas­sif” (Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006: 200). (Andrainar­ivo, et al., 2008; Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006)

Habi­tat

Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi oc­cu­pies low­land dry de­cid­u­ous forests in west­ern Mada­gas­car (Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006). Though its avail­able habi­tat is highly frag­mented and de­creas­ing in quan­tity and qual­ity, Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi is fre­quently en­coun­tered where found (Andrainar­ivo et al., 2008). It has an es­ti­mated den­sity of 60 in­di­vid­u­als/square kilo­me­ter within Ankarafantsika Na­tional Park (Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006). In­di­vid­u­als will use holes in dead or liv­ing trees as sleep­ing sites dur­ing the day (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006). (Andrainar­ivo, et al., 2008; Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2006)

  • Range elevation
    450 (high) m
    1476.38 (high) ft

Phys­i­cal De­scrip­tion

A mem­ber of the genus Lep­ile­mur and the fam­ily Lep­ile­muri­dae, Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemurs are, like other species of sportive lemurs, con­sid­ered medium-sized ver­ti­cal clingers and leapers (Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006; Thal­mann 2002). A salta­tory species, L. ed­wardsi is one of the larger mem­bers of its genus and ranges from 54 to 58 cm in total length (in­clud­ing tail length) and 27 to 29 cm in head-body length; body weight ranges from ap­prox­i­mately 700 to 1000 g (Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006; War­ren & Cromp­ton 1997a). Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemurs have white-tipped tails and gray-brown fur cov­er­ing their bod­ies and faces. The species has no­tice­ably siz­able ears and some­times has a dark stripe run­ning down the mid­dle of its back, with chest­nut-brown fur on the upper thighs, shoul­ders and fore­limbs. The front of its coat is gray with patches of cream col­ored fur (Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006). Males and fe­males are “sex­u­ally monomor­phic” and vary min­i­mally in body size, ex­cept dur­ing preg­nancy when the fe­male is con­sid­er­ably larger (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006; Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007). (Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006; Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina, et al., 2007; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2006; Thal­mann, 2002; War­ren and Cromp­ton, 1997a)

  • Sexual Dimorphism
  • sexes alike
  • Range mass
    700 to 1000 g
    24.67 to 35.24 oz
  • Range length
    54 to 58 cm
    21.26 to 22.83 in

Re­pro­duc­tion

Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi in­di­vid­u­als form dis­persed pair-bonds that cor­re­late to ter­ri­to­ries, which in­clude sleep­ing sites and feed­ing sites. So­cial­ity in this species of lemur ap­pears very much re­lated to "sleep­ing pair-bonds" (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006). Pairs have been ob­served to re­strict them­selves to the usage of 1 to 4 sleep­ing sites ei­ther si­mul­ta­ne­ously or al­ter­na­tively (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2003; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006). The species has been de­scribed as monog­a­mous and more gen­er­ally as pair-liv­ing (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2003; Thal­mann, 2006). Though L. ed­wardsi is con­sid­ered spa­tially monog­a­mous, this does not pre­clude the po­ten­tial for extra pair breed­ing (Méndez-Cárde­nas & Zim­mer­mann, 2009). (Méndez-Cárde­nas and Zim­mer­mann, 2009; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2003; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2006; Thal­mann, 2006)

Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi ex­hibits sea­sonal re­pro­duc­tion with a main mat­ing sea­son oc­cur­ring for about two months of the year be­tween May and June, cor­re­lat­ing with the be­gin­ning of this re­gion's dry sea­son in May. Fe­males go into es­trus for three months of the year, May through July, and males ex­hibit ap­par­ent sea­sonal vari­a­tion in the size of their testes (Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007). Neigh­bor­ing fe­males in dif­fer­ent home ranges may syn­chro­nize es­trus pe­ri­ods (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006). Male and fe­male body weight re­mains sim­i­lar dur­ing the mat­ing sea­son, al­though fe­males have a no­tice­ably higher body mass in Au­gust and No­vem­ber, most likely due to preg­nancy. The ob­served lit­ter size for Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi is lim­ited to one young. Du­ra­tion of ges­ta­tion is 4 to 5 months, with off­spring typ­i­cally born in Oc­to­ber or No­vem­ber (Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007). Lac­ta­tion typ­i­cally be­gins at the same time as the rainy sea­son of the re­gion, which be­gins in No­vem­ber (Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2003). (Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina, et al., 2007; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2003; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2006)

  • Breeding interval
    Milne-Edwards' sportive lemurs breed once yearly.
  • Breeding season
    The breeding season occurs from May to June.
  • Average number of offspring
    1
  • Average gestation period
    4-5 months
  • Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
    2 (low) years
  • Range age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)
    2 (low) years

There is lit­tle to no male parental in­vest­ment in Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemurs (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2000). For the first few days after birth, off­spring are left alone in sleep­ing trees (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2003). Moth­ers later carry in­fants in their mouths dur­ing for­ag­ing ac­tiv­i­ties (Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007). They also park their in­fants while for­ag­ing (Thal­mann, 2003). (Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina, et al., 2007; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2003; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2000)

There has been one ob­served in­ci­dence of in­fan­ti­cide in this species in Ankarafantsika Na­tional Park. A mother was out for­ag­ing with her two in­fants and parked the younger one on a branch nearby. A strange, un­known male came and re­peat­edly at­tacked the younger in­fant. This oc­cur­rence of in­fan­ti­cide, how­ever, was most likely a con­se­quence of “in­ci­den­tal ag­gres­sion” as op­posed to an ac­tion out of com­pe­ti­tion for re­sources be­cause the male did not at­tack the other in­fant for­ag­ing nearby. This event sug­gests that as­so­ci­a­tion with males may ben­e­fit fe­males due to in­creased sur­vival of off­spring (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2000; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2003). (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2003; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2000)

  • Parental Investment
  • female parental care
  • pre-fertilization
    • provisioning
    • protecting
      • female
  • pre-hatching/birth
    • provisioning
      • female
    • protecting
      • female
  • pre-weaning/fledging
    • provisioning
      • female
    • protecting
      • female
  • pre-independence
    • provisioning
      • female
    • protecting
      • female

Lifes­pan/Longevity

In­for­ma­tion on the lifes­pan and longevity of Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemurs is lack­ing (John­son, 2008). There are no known in­stances of suc­cess­ful breed­ing in cap­tiv­ity (Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007). (John­son, 2008; Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina, et al., 2007)

Be­hav­ior

A noc­tur­nal species, ac­tive pe­ri­ods for L. ed­wardsi cor­re­spond to tem­po­ral changes in the length of the day. Par­tic­u­lar ac­tiv­i­ties, in­clud­ing groom­ing, for­ag­ing, and trav­el­ing, vary in fre­quency dur­ing the night (War­ren & Cromp­ton, 1997a). They al­ter­nate pe­ri­ods of ac­tiv­ity with rest and are most ac­tive for the few hours im­me­di­ately fol­low­ing dusk (Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006). Fe­males and males form dis­persed sleep­ing-pairs and mem­bers of the same sleep­ing pair will share home ranges, in­clud­ing sleep­ing and feed­ing sites (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2003; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006). How­ever, the num­ber of in­di­vid­u­als found in par­tic­u­lar sleep­ing sites can vary from a soli­tary in­di­vid­ual to an ad­di­tional two or three an­i­mals, and up to mul­ti­ple in­di­vid­u­als (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006; Thal­mann, 2002; Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006). Though they share sleep­ing holes, Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemurs usu­ally for­age soli­tar­ily at night (Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006). They have been ob­served ac­tive mul­ti­ple times at the open­ing of their sleep hole dur­ing the day­time, yet will quickly re­turn at any sign of a threat (War­ren & Cromp­ton, 1997a). (Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2003; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2006; Thal­mann, 2002; War­ren and Cromp­ton, 1997a)

  • Average territory size
    10000 m^2

Home Range

The av­er­age home range of Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemurs is ap­prox­i­mately 1 hectare for both males and fe­males. They fol­low an av­er­age nightly path of 343 m (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006; Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007). In­di­vid­u­als de­fend home ranges by vo­cal­iz­ing loudly and force­fully shak­ing the branches of trees (Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006). The de­fense of ter­ri­tory may be the re­sult of in­ter- and in­tra-sex­ual re­source com­pe­ti­tion (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2003). (Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006; Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina, et al., 2007; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2003; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2006)

Com­mu­ni­ca­tion and Per­cep­tion

Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi lacks "spe­cial­ized glands” for mark­ing ter­ri­tory and there­fore does not use scent or urine to es­tab­lish ter­ri­to­ries. In­stead, these lemurs use loud calls to com­mu­ni­cate ter­ri­to­ri­al­ity. Calls occur both in the morn­ings and evenings and are sex-spe­cific. Nine types of calls have been iden­ti­fied with 3 used ex­clu­sively by fe­males, 5 used ex­clu­sively by males, and 1 used by both sexes. Most calls are re­lated to sleep­ing or feed­ing sites, and they are hy­poth­e­sized to be re­lated to mate de­fense and at­trac­tion as well as re­source de­fense. It is thought that loud vo­cal­iza­tions also serve in "reg­u­lat­ing spac­ing and co­he­sion” (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006: 598). (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2006)

Mem­bers of pairs "duet" with one an­other; both males and fe­males par­tic­i­pate equally in duet­ting, and this be­hav­ior is wit­nessed more fre­quently dur­ing the pe­riod of off­spring care and at feed­ing sites as op­posed to sleep­ing sites. Duet­ting causes the "syn­chro­niza­tion" of dif­fer­ent types of be­hav­ior, es­pe­cially move­ment. Be­cause this vocal syn­chro­niza­tion be­hav­ior most often oc­curs fol­low­ing birth of off­spring and when the fe­male is lac­tat­ing, Méndez-Cárde­nas and Zim­mer­mann (2009) pro­posed that duet­ting serves to lessen the risks of in­fan­ti­cide and to pro­tect a pair's ter­ri­tory, par­tic­u­larly their food re­sources. (Méndez-Cárde­nas and Zim­mer­mann, 2009)

  • Other Communication Modes
  • duets

Food Habits

In­di­vid­u­als of both sexes for­age soli­tar­ily at night, but a sleep­ing pair will search for food within the same range (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2006; Thal­mann, 2001). This species is pri­mar­ily fo­liv­o­rous, how­ever, they will con­sume plump seeds, flow­ers, and fruits (Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006). They are rel­a­tively undis­crim­i­nat­ing and will se­lect from com­mon species of trees. Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemurs have a larger food re­source base when com­pared to the sym­patric Avahi oc­ci­den­talis (Thal­mann, 2002). Though there is lit­tle over­lap be­tween these two species with re­gards to food re­sources, com­pe­ti­tion with Avahi oc­ci­den­talis may ex­plain the ten­dency of Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi to eat leaves of poorer nu­tri­tive value in Ankarafantsika com­pared to other habi­tats in which it oc­curs (Thal­mann, 2006; Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006). (Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2006; Thal­mann, 2001; Thal­mann, 2002; Thal­mann, 2006)

  • Plant Foods
  • leaves
  • seeds, grains, and nuts
  • fruit
  • flowers

Pre­da­tion

Fos­sas (Cryp­to­procta ferox) are main preda­tors of Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi (Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006). While being pur­sued by a fossa, a Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemur was ob­served “jump­ing rapidly from tree to tree into the vicin­ity of its sleep­ing site emit­ting loud bark call se­quences” (Scheumann et al., 2007: 110). The va­ri­ety of calls seemed to change and be­came more in­sis­tent in fre­quency and vol­ume when the fossa came close to cap­tur­ing L. ed­wardsi. Shriek­ing out of fear has been shown to draw other sportive lemurs in the area to gather and pro­duce alarm calls as well (Scheumann et al., 2007). (Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006; Scheumann, et al., 2007)

Birds of prey, rep­tiles, such as boas, and other car­ni­vores (apart from fos­sas) prey on lemurs (Scheumann et al., 2007; Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2003). (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2003; Scheumann, et al., 2007)

  • Anti-predator Adaptations
  • cryptic

Ecosys­tem Roles

In Ankarafantsika, Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi is sym­patric with Avahi oc­ci­den­talis, Pro­p­ithe­cus ver­reauxi co­quereli, Eu­le­mur ful­vus, Eu­le­mur macaco, Mi­cro­ce­bus mur­i­nus, and Cheirogaleus medius, and may com­pete with Pro­p­ithe­cus ver­reauxi co­quereli, Eu­le­mur ful­vus, and Eu­le­mur macaco (War­ren & Cromp­ton, 1997b). Sportive lemurs serve as prey for nu­mer­ous taxa (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona et al., 2003). (Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, et al., 2003; War­ren and Cromp­ton, 1997b)

Eco­nomic Im­por­tance for Hu­mans: Pos­i­tive

Hu­mans will oc­ca­sion­ally con­sume Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi (Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006). (Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006)

  • Positive Impacts
  • food

Eco­nomic Im­por­tance for Hu­mans: Neg­a­tive

There are no known ad­verse ef­fects of Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi on hu­mans.

Con­ser­va­tion Sta­tus

Habi­tat de­struc­tion due to clear­ing of for­est with fires for agri­cul­ture and live­stock graz­ing pas­ture, as well as the species' role as a food source for hu­mans, pose threats to Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi (Andrainar­ivo et al., 2008; Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006; Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007). Its small num­ber of off­spring each year puts this species at higher risk (Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007). In ad­di­tion, the species does not ex­hibit an in­nate fear of new and po­ten­tially threat­en­ing or­gan­isms such as hu­mans even in areas with poach­ing (Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina et al., 2007). Ankarafantsika Na­tional Park is cur­rently the sin­gle pro­tected area in which Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi is found, but they are also pre­sent in a 50,300 hectare pro­posed pro­tected area on the Bon­golava Mas­sif (Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006). (Andrainar­ivo, et al., 2008; Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006; Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina, et al., 2007)

Other Com­ments

This species may be mis­taken for the sym­patric species of lemur, Avahi oc­ci­den­talis, which has a sim­i­lar stature (Mit­ter­meier et al. 2006; Thal­mann 2001). Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemurs can be dif­fer­en­ti­ated by their “darker color, pointed face and more promi­nent ears” (Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006: 200). (Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006; Thal­mann, 2001)

The num­ber of species rec­og­nized as mem­bers of the genus Lep­ile­mur and the clas­si­fi­ca­tion of this taxon has been de­bated. Ac­cord­ing to Louis, Jr. et al. (2006), eleven for­merly un­rec­og­nized sportive lemurs should be clas­si­fied in the same genus and fam­ily with L. ed­wardsi, which was most closely re­lated to Lep­ile­mur grew­cocki (Lep­ile­mur grew­cock­o­rum) in their analy­sis. A study by An­dri­a­holini­rina et al. (2006), on the other hand, rec­og­nized three new species, with L. ed­wardsi most closely re­lated to Lep­ile­mur mi­crodon. There is also dis­agree­ment in the lit­er­a­ture as to whether Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi, and sportive lemurs in gen­eral, should be clas­si­fied as mem­bers of the fam­ily Lep­ile­muri­dae or as part of the fam­ily Lep­ile­muri­dae, which in­cludes the ex­tinct genus of giant lemur Mega­l­adapis (Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006). (An­dri­a­holini­rina, et al., 2006; Louis, Jr., et al., 2006; Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006)

This species is also known as: Milne-Ed­wards’ weasel lemur, Lépile­mur de Milne-Ed­wards (French), Lemur Co­madreja De Ed­wards (Span­ish), Ed­wards Wiesel­maki (Ger­man), and Repa­haka/Boeng/Bo­engy/Kitronto Ki­tanta (Mala­gasy) (Mit­ter­meier et al., 2006; Andrainar­ivo et al., 2008). (Andrainar­ivo, et al., 2008; Mit­ter­meier, et al., 2006)

Con­trib­u­tors

Julia Os­ter­man (au­thor), Yale Uni­ver­sity, Eric Sar­gis (ed­i­tor), Yale Uni­ver­sity, Rachel Raci­cot (ed­i­tor), Yale Uni­ver­sity, Tanya Dewey (ed­i­tor), Uni­ver­sity of Michi­gan-Ann Arbor.

Glossary

Ethiopian

living in sub-Saharan Africa (south of 30 degrees north) and Madagascar.

World Map

acoustic

uses sound to communicate

arboreal

Referring to an animal that lives in trees; tree-climbing.

bilateral symmetry

having body symmetry such that the animal can be divided in one plane into two mirror-image halves. Animals with bilateral symmetry have dorsal and ventral sides, as well as anterior and posterior ends. Synapomorphy of the Bilateria.

chemical

uses smells or other chemicals to communicate

cryptic

having markings, coloration, shapes, or other features that cause an animal to be camouflaged in its natural environment; being difficult to see or otherwise detect.

duets

to jointly display, usually with sounds in a highly coordinated fashion, at the same time as one other individual of the same species, often a mate

endothermic

animals that use metabolically generated heat to regulate body temperature independently of ambient temperature. Endothermy is a synapomorphy of the Mammalia, although it may have arisen in a (now extinct) synapsid ancestor; the fossil record does not distinguish these possibilities. Convergent in birds.

female parental care

parental care is carried out by females

folivore

an animal that mainly eats leaves.

food

A substance that provides both nutrients and energy to a living thing.

forest

forest biomes are dominated by trees, otherwise forest biomes can vary widely in amount of precipitation and seasonality.

herbivore

An animal that eats mainly plants or parts of plants.

island endemic

animals that live only on an island or set of islands.

iteroparous

offspring are produced in more than one group (litters, clutches, etc.) and across multiple seasons (or other periods hospitable to reproduction). Iteroparous animals must, by definition, survive over multiple seasons (or periodic condition changes).

monogamous

Having one mate at a time.

motile

having the capacity to move from one place to another.

native range

the area in which the animal is naturally found, the region in which it is endemic.

nocturnal

active during the night

saltatorial

specialized for leaping or bounding locomotion; jumps or hops.

seasonal breeding

breeding is confined to a particular season

sedentary

remains in the same area

sexual

reproduction that includes combining the genetic contribution of two individuals, a male and a female

social

associates with others of its species; forms social groups.

tactile

uses touch to communicate

terrestrial

Living on the ground.

territorial

defends an area within the home range, occupied by a single animals or group of animals of the same species and held through overt defense, display, or advertisement

tropical

the region of the earth that surrounds the equator, from 23.5 degrees north to 23.5 degrees south.

visual

uses sight to communicate

viviparous

reproduction in which fertilization and development take place within the female body and the developing embryo derives nourishment from the female.

Ref­er­ences

Andrainar­ivo, C., V. An­dri­a­holini­rina, A. Feist­ner, T. Felix, J. Ganzhorn, N. Gar­butt, C. Golden, B. Kon­stant, E. Louis Jr., D. Mey­ers, R. Mit­ter­meier, A. Perieras, F. Princee, J. Rabariv­ola, B. Rako­to­sami­manana, H. Rasami­manana, J. Rat­sim­bazafy, G. Rav­eloari­noro, A. Razafi­manantsoa, Y. Rum­pler, C. Schwitzer, U. Thal­mann, L. Wilmé, P. Wright. 2008. "Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi" (On-line). IUCN Red List of Threat­ened Species. Ac­cessed April 12, 2012 at http://​www.​iucnredlist.​org/​apps/​redlist/​details/​11617/​0.

An­dri­a­holini­rina, N., J. Fausser, C. Roos, I. Ravoa­ri­manana, J. Ganzhorn, B. Meier, R. Hil­gar­t­ner, L. Wal­ter, A. Zaramody, C. Langer, T. Hahn, E. Zim­mer­mann, U. Rade­spiel, M. Craul, J. Tomiuk, I. Tat­ter­sall, Y. Rum­pler. 2006. Mol­e­c­u­lar phy­logeny and tax­o­nomic re­vi­sion of the sportive lemurs (Lep­ile­mur, Pri­mates). BMC Evo­lu­tion­ary Bi­ol­ogy, 6/17. Ac­cessed May 01, 2012 at http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2148/​6/​17.

John­son, D. 2008. "The Life Spans of Non­hu­man Pri­mates" (On-line). Pri­mate Info Net. Ac­cessed May 01, 2012 at http://​pin.​primate.​wisc.​edu/​aboutp/​phys/​lifespan.​html.

Louis, Jr., E., S. En­g­berg, R. Lei, H. Geng, J. Som­mer, R. Ran­dria­mam­pi­onona, J. Ran­dria­manana, J. Za­onar­iv­elo, R. An­driantom­po­ha­vana, G. Ran­dria, Pros­per, B. Ra­maromi­lanto, G. Rako­toarisoa, A. Rooney, R. Bren­ne­man. 2006. Mol­e­c­u­lar and Mor­pho­log­i­cal Analy­ses of the Sportive Lemurs (Fam­ily Mega­l­adap­i­dae: Genus Lep­ile­mur) Re­veals 11 Pre­vi­ously Un­rec­og­nized Species. Spe­cial Pub­li­ca­tions: Mu­seum of Texas Tech Uni­ver­sity, 49: 1-46.

Mit­ter­meier, R., W. Kon­stant, F. Hawkins, E. Louis, O. Lan­grand, J. Rat­sim­bazafy, R. Ra­soloari­son, J. Ganzhorn, S. Ra­jao­belina, I. Tat­ter­sall, D. Mey­ers. 2006. Con­ser­va­tion In­ter­na­tional Trop­i­cal Field Guide Se­ries: Lemurs of Mada­gas­car. Wash­ing­ton, D.C.: Con­ser­va­tion In­ter­na­tional.

Méndez-Cárde­nas, M., E. Zim­mer­mann. 2009. Duet­ting- A Mech­a­nism to Strengthen Pair Bonds in a Dis­persed Pair-Liv­ing Pri­mate (Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi)?. Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Phys­i­cal An­thro­pol­ogy, 139: 523-532.

Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina, B., S. Mbo­ti­zafy, S. Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, R. Ravoa­hangi­malala, E. Zim­mer­mann. 2007. Sea­son­al­ity in Re­pro­duc­tion of Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi. In­ter­na­tional Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 28: 783-790.

Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, S., B. Rako­to­sami­manana, B. Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina, E. Zim­mer­mann. 2003. Pair-spe­cific usage of sleep­ing sites and their im­pli­ca­tions for so­cial or­ga­ni­za­tion in a noc­tur­nal Mala­gasy pri­mate, the Milne Ed­wards' sportive lemur (Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi). Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Phys­i­cal An­thro­pol­ogy, 122: 251-258.

Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, S., B. Rako­to­sami­manana, E. Zim­mer­mann. 2000. In­fan­ti­cide by a Male Milne-Ed­wards' Sportive Lemur (Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi) in Ampi­joroa, NW-Mada­gas­car. In­ter­na­tional Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 21/1: 41-45.

Ra­solo­har­i­jaona, S., B. Ran­dri­anam­bin­ina, P. Braune, E. Zim­mer­mann. 2006. Loud call­ing spac­ing and co­he­sive­ness in a noc­tur­nal pri­mate, the Milne-Ed­wards' sportive lemur. Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Phys­i­cal An­thro­pol­ogy, 129: 591-600.

Scheumann, M., A. Rabesan­dratana, E. Zim­mer­mann. 2007. Pre­da­tion, Com­mu­ni­ca­tion, and Cog­ni­tion in Lemurs. Pp. 100-126 in S Gursky, K Nekaris, eds. Pri­mate Anti-Preda­tor Strate­gies. On­line: Springer US. Ac­cessed April 11, 2012 at http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-0-387-34810-0_​5.

Thal­mann, U. 2002. Con­trasts Be­tween Two Noc­tur­nal Leaf-Eat­ing Lemurs. Evo­lu­tion­ary An­thro­pol­ogy, 11: 105-107.

Thal­mann, U. 2001. Food re­source char­ac­ter­is­tics in two noc­tur­nal lemurs with dif­fer­ent so­cial be­hav­ior: Avahi oc­ci­den­talis and Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi. In­ter­na­tional Jour­nal of Pri­ma­tol­ogy, 22: 287-323.

Thal­mann, U. 2006. Be­hav­ioral and Eco­log­i­cal Adap­ta­tions in Two Small Fo­liv­o­rous Lemurs with Dif­fer­ent So­cial Or­ga­ni­za­tion: Avahi and Lep­ile­mur. Pp. 327-352 in L Gould, M Sauther, eds. Lemurs: Ecol­ogy and Adap­ta­tion. USA: Springer.

War­ren, R., R. Cromp­ton. 1997. A com­par­a­tive study of rang­ing be­hav­iour, ac­tiv­ity rhythms and so­cial­ity of Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi (Pri­mates, Lep­ile­muri­dae) and Avahi oc­ci­den­talis (Pri­mates, In­dri­idae) at Ampi­joroa, Mada­gas­car. Jour­nal of Zo­ol­ogy, 243: 397-415.

War­ren, R., R. Cromp­ton. 1997. Lo­co­mo­tor ecol­ogy of Lep­ile­mur ed­wardsi and Avahi oc­ci­den­talis. Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Phys­i­cal An­thro­pol­ogy, 104: 471-486.